Elevating Value Dossiers with Patient-Centric Strategies
The importance of patient centricity in processes ranging from evidence generation to health technology assessments (HTA) and subsequent access/reimbursement decisions is increasingly recognised within the drug development industry. Patients offer unique insights into the lived experience of their condition, treatment challenges, unmet needs and how new treatments can improve their quality of life (QoL), so it stands to reason that their voices should be heard throughout the drug development process.
A recent white paper by the Office of Health Economics (OHE) considered how HTA agencies in 14 countries have evolved over time, and found an increasing trend for patient involvement throughout the HTA process. Of the 14 HTA agencies considered, 13 have evolved their position on patient involvement since 2010. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), the Canadian Drug Agency (CDA-AMC; previously CADTH), the Agency for Care Effectiveness (ACE; Singapore) and the Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG; Germany) specifically include patient input in their decision making, explicitly recognising the importance of the patient perspective in the HTA process. The new EU Joint Clinical Assessment (JCA) process coming into effect in January 2025 also provides guidance on patient involvement in the JCA process, which may help to standardise how patient input is incorporated into HTA decision making across the 27 EU member states. The OHE also investigated how patient-centred evidence is considered during HTA across ten different HTA agencies – a summary of their findings is presented in Figure 1. There is no doubt that HTA bodies are increasingly recognising the value of patient-centred evidence, though the availability of formal guidance around its use in HTA varies.
It is therefore worth considering early how best to incorporate patient perspectives and patient-centred evidence into the value narratives for new products, to ensure that these aspects can be conveyed in subsequent national and global materials for use in HTA and downstream reimbursement processes.
Figure 1: Summary of Patient Involvement across 10 HTA Agencies
Footnotes: 1USA does not have a formal, national HTA body; ICER guidelines are used to represent US guidance. 2Countries that recommend public valuation of health states, and those that accept patient valuations, are distinguished. 3Yellow cells indicate the involvement of public members or patient representatives/advocates, but not necessarily patients themselves.
Adapted from: Kumar G. et al, 2024. Incorporating the Patient Voice in Health Technology Assessment. Office of Health Economics. Available here. [Last accessed: 06 Nov 2024]. Permission obtained to reproduce image.
Abbreviations: DCE: discrete choice experiment; HRQoL: health-related quality of life; HTA: health technology assessment; WTP: willingness-to-pay; UK: United Kingdom; USA: United States of America.